The Good, Bad Things Tinubu’s Regime Has Done In Two Years
While congratulating President Bola Ahmed Tinubu (PBAT) on completing two years at the helm of Nigeria’s leadership, I refrain from hastily adding to the chorus of uncritical praise for his administration or its governance style, writes Daily Trust.
Without entirely dismissing the narratives propagated by sycophantic voices, it is essential to evaluate a government’s success through a multidimensional lens, assessing its short-, medium-, and long-term strategies and their tangible impact on the nation.
There is no disputing that President Tinubu has undertaken bold reforms, some of which may yield long-term benefits in mitigating Nigeria’s economic challenges. However, it is equally crucial to scrutinize the immediate and intermediate effects of these policies, particularly on the most vulnerable segments of society.
The administration’s most glaring flaw has been its impulsive and often knee-jerk approach to policy implementation, which suggests inadequate forethought and poor rationalization of consequences. This has fostered a perception of governance by reaction rather than proactive strategy – A bizarre “fire brigade” style of leadership that exacerbates instability rather than fostering sustainable progress.
The resultant economic hardship has deepened public disillusionment, fuelling widespread apathy toward the government.
Compounding these issues is the administration’s alarming disconnect from the citizenry. Poor communication, opaque decision-making, and an absence of meaningful engagement have left Nigerians feeling alienated from their government. There is a palpable sense of remoteness, as though policies are crafted in isolation from the realities of those they affect.
Key areas of concern
- Tone-deaf leadership amid economic hardship
The opulent lifestyle flaunted by President Tinubu and certain members of his cabinet stands in stark contrast to the economic suffering endured by ordinary Nigerians. Such displays of extravagance, coupled with an arrogant, dismissive posturing and a projection of insensitivity of an unprecedented degree, further eroding public trust.
ad
- Lopsided appointments and exclusionary governance*
The administration’s appointments to key political offices have been bizarrely skewed, disregarding the constitutional imperative of federal character. In a nation as diverse as Nigeria, inclusivity is not merely a symbolic gesture but a necessity for stability and unity. The current trend risks deepening divisions and fostering resentment among marginalised regions.
- Erosion of institutional checks and balances*
The near-total absence of oversight by the legislative and judicial arms of government is deeply troubling. While cooperation between branches is expected, the legislature and judiciary must not abdicate their constitutional roles as checks on executive power. Their apparent acquiescence undermines democracy and enables unchecked governance.
Acknowledging progress amidst challenges: To be fair, President Tinubu deserves commendation for confronting politically contentious issues such as the removal of petroleum subsidies and the unification of exchange rates, though painful but necessary reforms with potential long-term benefits. Similarly, the establishment of development commissions across the six geopolitical zones could foster interregional collaboration and equitable growth.
However, these strides do not negate the urgent need for course correction. As we mark the administration’s second anniversary, we must candidly address its deficiencies: reckless policy rollout, elitist indifference, exclusionary politics, and institutional weakness. Moving forward, the president must prioritise inclusive governance, evidence-based policy making, and robust public engagement to restore confidence and steer Nigeria toward recovery.
The next two years present an opportunity for redemption, but only if these pressing concerns are met with decisive action.
